Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MCLAREN BAY SPECIAL CARE 2026-04-26 21:55 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MCLAREN BAY SPECIAL CARE
CCN 232020 | MI | 15 beds | Current EBITDA $1.2M → Pro Forma $1.6M (+$387K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$7.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$387K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+539bps
Margin Improvement
$275K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$387K
Modeled Uplift
$280K
Risk-Adjusted
-$107K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$146K
+204bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$144K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$87K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+13bp
Total EBITDA Impact$387K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$138K$8K$146K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$144K$144K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$22K$65K$87K$275K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT58.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$37K$73K$110K$146K$146K$146K$146K
Cost to Collect$0$36K$72K$108K$144K$144K$144K$144K
A/R Days Reduction$0$29K$58K$87K$87K$87K$87K$87K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$106K$213K$315K$387K$387K$387K$387K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $387K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.8x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
9.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x
10.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x
11.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x
12.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.1x
Headroom (turns)
1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.4x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.2M$1.2M16.9%
Year 1$1.3M+$258K$1.5M21.0%
Year 2$1.3M+$387K$1.7M23.3%
Year 3$1.3M+$387K$1.7M23.9%
Year 4$1.4M+$387K$1.8M24.4%
Year 5$1.4M+$387K$1.8M25.0%
$12.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$19.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$7.6M
Value Created
$1.8M
Exit EBITDA
$1.9M
Organic Growth
$3.9M
RCM Value Creation
$1.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$73K$110K$146K$176K
Cost to Collect$72K$108K$144K$172K
A/R Days Reduction$44K$66K$87K$105K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$194K$290K$387K$464K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 45 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin16.9%-9.4%1.2%9.3%
P95
Net-to-Gross34.6%39.6%45.7%58.1%
P14
Occupancy73.6%12.0%24.7%41.3%
P93
Rev/Bed$479K$909K$1.7M$2.4M
P5
Exp/Bed$398K$873K$1.6M$2.4M
P4

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML