Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL 2026-04-27 01:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL
CCN 231337 | MI | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $8.3M → Pro Forma $13.9M (+$5.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 231337

ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$106.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$13.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$5.6M
Modeled Uplift
$4.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.4M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.2M (vs $5.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$68K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.1M$2.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.0M$58K$2.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$326K$967K$1.3M$4.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$68K$68K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$531K$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$526K$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$431K$862K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$34K$68K$68K$68K$68K$68K$68K
Cumulative$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.6x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.6x
9.0x54% / 8.7x58% / 10.0x62% / 11.3x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.6x
10.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x
11.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x
12.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.4x
Headroom (turns)
22%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 22% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.1x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.3M$8.3M7.8%
Year 1$8.6M+$3.7M$12.3M11.6%
Year 2$8.8M+$5.6M$14.4M13.6%
Year 3$9.1M+$5.6M$14.7M13.8%
Year 4$9.4M+$5.6M$14.9M14.1%
Year 5$9.6M+$5.6M$15.2M14.3%
$83.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$167.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$84.3M
Value Created
$15.2M
Exit EBITDA
$13.2M
Organic Growth
$55.9M
RCM Value Creation
$15.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M
A/R Days Reduction$646K$969K$1.3M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$34K$51K$68K$82K
Total$2.8M$4.2M$5.6M$6.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 73 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.8%-11.6%-3.4%8.0%
P74
Net-to-Gross31.5%33.2%40.1%48.5%
P18
Occupancy63.7%12.9%28.2%53.0%
P84
Rev/Bed$4.2M$657K$1.4M$2.4M
P96
Exp/Bed$3.9M$712K$1.5M$2.4M
P96

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML