Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SPARROW IONIA HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 21:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SPARROW IONIA HOSPITAL
CCN 231331 | MI | 22 beds | Current EBITDA $6.3M → Pro Forma $9.7M (+$3.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$65.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$3.4M
Modeled Uplift
$2.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.3M (vs $3.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$791K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$42K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.3M$1.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.3M$36K$1.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$199K$591K$791K$2.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$42K$42K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT55.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$325K$650K$975K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$322K$643K$965K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$264K$527K$791K$791K$791K$791K$791K
Clean Claim Rate$0$21K$42K$42K$42K$42K$42K$42K
Cumulative$0$931K$1.9M$2.8M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.6x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.3x
9.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.1x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x
10.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.0x
11.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x
12.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.0x
Headroom (turns)
16%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 16% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.5x, adding 3.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.3M$6.3M9.7%
Year 1$6.5M+$2.3M$8.8M13.5%
Year 2$6.7M+$3.4M$10.1M15.5%
Year 3$6.9M+$3.4M$10.3M15.8%
Year 4$7.1M+$3.4M$10.5M16.2%
Year 5$7.3M+$3.4M$10.7M16.5%
$62.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$117.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$54.9M
Value Created
$10.7M
Exit EBITDA
$10.0M
Organic Growth
$34.2M
RCM Value Creation
$10.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$650K$975K$1.3M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$643K$965K$1.3M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$395K$593K$791K$949K
Clean Claim Rate$21K$31K$42K$50K
Total$1.7M$2.6M$3.4M$4.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 60 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.7%-10.8%0.6%9.2%
P76
Net-to-Gross40.0%33.5%42.7%55.0%
P36
Occupancy32.9%16.6%28.2%54.3%
P56
Rev/Bed$3.0M$628K$1.4M$2.2M
P83
Exp/Bed$2.7M$613K$1.5M$2.3M
P82

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML