Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MUNSON HEALTHCARE CHARLEVOIX HOSPITA 2026-04-26 17:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MUNSON HEALTHCARE CHARLEVOIX HOSPITA
CCN 231322 | MI | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $1.4M → Pro Forma $5.3M (+$3.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$73.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$3.9M
Modeled Uplift
$2.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.4M (vs $3.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$895K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$47K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.5M$1.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.4M$40K$1.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$226K$669K$895K$2.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$47K$47K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$368K$736K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$364K$728K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$298K$597K$895K$895K$895K$895K$895K
Clean Claim Rate$0$24K$47K$47K$47K$47K$47K$47K
Cumulative$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.1M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x91% / 25.3x95% / 28.5x100% / 31.6x101% / 33.2x103% / 34.8x
9.0x86% / 22.1x90% / 24.9x94% / 27.8x96% / 29.2x98% / 30.6x
10.0x81% / 19.6x86% / 22.1x90% / 24.6x92% / 25.9x94% / 27.2x
11.0x77% / 17.5x82% / 19.8x86% / 22.1x88% / 23.3x89% / 24.4x
12.0x74% / 15.8x78% / 17.9x82% / 20.0x84% / 21.1x86% / 22.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.2x
Headroom (turns)
65%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 65% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.3x, adding 6.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.4M$1.4M1.9%
Year 1$1.5M+$2.6M$4.0M5.5%
Year 2$1.5M+$3.9M$5.4M7.3%
Year 3$1.5M+$3.9M$5.4M7.4%
Year 4$1.6M+$3.9M$5.5M7.4%
Year 5$1.6M+$3.9M$5.5M7.5%
$14.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$60.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$46.5M
Value Created
$5.5M
Exit EBITDA
$2.2M
Organic Growth
$38.7M
RCM Value Creation
$5.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$736K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$728K$1.1M$1.5M$1.7M
A/R Days Reduction$448K$671K$895K$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$24K$35K$47K$56K
Total$1.9M$2.9M$3.9M$4.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 73 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.9%-11.6%-3.4%8.0%
P64
Net-to-Gross59.5%33.2%40.1%48.5%
P86
Occupancy20.2%12.9%28.2%53.0%
P38
Rev/Bed$2.9M$657K$1.4M$2.4M
P86
Exp/Bed$2.9M$712K$1.5M$2.4M
P88

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML