Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HILLS & DALES GENERAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 11:55 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HILLS & DALES GENERAL HOSPITAL
CCN 231316 | MI | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $497K → Pro Forma $2.7M (+$2.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$41.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$497K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$2.2M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$813K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $2.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$824K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$816K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$501K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$26K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$824K$824K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$793K$23K$816K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$126K$375K$501K$1.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$26K$26K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$206K$412K$618K$824K$824K$824K$824K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$204K$408K$612K$816K$816K$816K$816K
A/R Days Reduction$0$167K$334K$501K$501K$501K$501K$501K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K
Cumulative$0$590K$1.2M$1.8M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x106% / 37.1x111% / 41.6x115% / 46.1x117% / 48.3x119% / 50.6x
9.0x101% / 32.6x105% / 36.6x110% / 40.6x112% / 42.6x114% / 44.6x
10.0x96% / 29.1x101% / 32.6x105% / 36.2x107% / 38.0x109% / 39.8x
11.0x92% / 26.1x97% / 29.4x101% / 32.6x103% / 34.3x105% / 35.9x
12.0x88% / 23.7x93% / 26.7x97% / 29.6x99% / 31.1x101% / 32.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.9x
Headroom (turns)
76%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 76% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.6x, adding 6.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$497K$497K1.2%
Year 1$512K+$1.4M$2.0M4.7%
Year 2$527K+$2.2M$2.7M6.5%
Year 3$543K+$2.2M$2.7M6.6%
Year 4$559K+$2.2M$2.7M6.6%
Year 5$576K+$2.2M$2.7M6.7%
$5.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$30.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$25.2M
Value Created
$2.7M
Exit EBITDA
$791K
Organic Growth
$21.7M
RCM Value Creation
$2.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$412K$618K$824K$989K
Denial Rate Reductio$408K$612K$816K$979K
A/R Days Reduction$251K$376K$501K$602K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$20K$26K$32K
Total$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 73 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.2%-11.6%-3.4%8.0%
P60
Net-to-Gross52.0%33.2%40.1%48.5%
P79
Occupancy23.7%12.9%28.2%53.0%
P45
Rev/Bed$1.6M$657K$1.4M$2.4M
P54
Exp/Bed$1.6M$712K$1.5M$2.4M
P53

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML