Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION STANDISH HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 17:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION STANDISH HOSPITAL
CCN 231305 | MI | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.2M → Pro Forma $81K (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$24.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$81K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$930K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$765K
Risk-Adjusted
-$510K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$485K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$480K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$295K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$16K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$485K$485K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$467K$13K$480K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$74K$221K$295K$930K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$16K$16K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$121K$242K$364K$485K$485K$485K$485K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$120K$240K$360K$480K$480K$480K$480K
A/R Days Reduction$0$98K$197K$295K$295K$295K$295K$295K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K
Cumulative$0$347K$695K$1.0M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-125.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
131.8x
Headroom (turns)
2027%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 2027% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -125.3x, adding 224.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.2M$-1.2M-4.9%
Year 1$-1.2M+$850K$-380K-1.6%
Year 2$-1.3M+$1.3M$8K0.0%
Year 3$-1.3M+$1.3M$-30K-0.1%
Year 4$-1.3M+$1.3M$-69K-0.3%
Year 5$-1.4M+$1.3M$-110K-0.5%
$-11.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$10.7M
Value Created
$-110K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.9M
Organic Growth
$12.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-110K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$242K$364K$485K$582K
Denial Rate Reductio$240K$360K$480K$576K
A/R Days Reduction$148K$221K$295K$354K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$16K$19K
Total$638K$957K$1.3M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 73 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.9%-11.6%-3.4%8.0%
P44
Net-to-Gross43.9%33.2%40.1%48.5%
P65
Occupancy17.9%12.9%28.2%53.0%
P32
Rev/Bed$970K$657K$1.4M$2.4M
P33
Exp/Bed$1.0M$712K$1.5M$2.4M
P33

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML