Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HENRY FORD WEST BLOOMFIELD HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:57 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HENRY FORD WEST BLOOMFIELD HOSPITAL
CCN 230302 | MI | 191 beds | Current EBITDA $24.4M → Pro Forma $47.8M (+$23.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$446.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$24.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$23.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$47.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$17.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$23.5M
Modeled Uplift
$17.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $17.5M (vs $23.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$285K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$23.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.9M$8.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.6M$245K$8.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.4M$4.1M$5.4M$17.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$285K$285K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.2M$4.5M$6.7M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.2M$4.4M$6.6M$8.8M$8.8M$8.8M$8.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$143K$285K$285K$285K$285K$285K$285K
Cumulative$0$6.4M$12.8M$19.0M$23.5M$23.5M$23.5M$23.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $23.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x65% / 12.3x70% / 14.0x73% / 15.7x75% / 16.6x77% / 17.4x
9.0x60% / 10.5x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.6x70% / 14.4x72% / 15.1x
10.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.5x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x68% / 13.3x
11.0x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x
12.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.2x
Headroom (turns)
34%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 34% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.3x, adding 4.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$24.4M$24.4M5.5%
Year 1$25.1M+$15.6M$40.8M9.1%
Year 2$25.9M+$23.5M$49.3M11.1%
Year 3$26.6M+$23.5M$50.1M11.2%
Year 4$27.4M+$23.5M$50.9M11.4%
Year 5$28.3M+$23.5M$51.7M11.6%
$243.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$569.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$325.2M
Value Created
$51.7M
Exit EBITDA
$38.8M
Organic Growth
$234.6M
RCM Value Creation
$51.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.5M$6.7M$8.9M$10.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.4M$6.6M$8.8M$10.6M
A/R Days Reduction$2.7M$4.1M$5.4M$6.5M
Clean Claim Rate$143K$214K$285K$343K
Total$11.7M$17.6M$23.5M$28.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 55 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.5%-13.5%-7.1%-0.2%
P85
Net-to-Gross32.8%24.3%30.5%36.2%
P59
Occupancy82.5%56.2%68.0%80.0%
P80
Rev/Bed$2.3M$990K$1.4M$1.9M
P91
Exp/Bed$2.2M$991K$1.4M$2.1M
P78

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML