Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER MIDLAND 2026-04-26 03:49 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER MIDLAND
CCN 230222 | MI | 195 beds | Current EBITDA $-51.5M → Pro Forma $-23.2M (+$28.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$537.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-51.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$28.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-23.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$20.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$28.3M
Modeled Uplift
$21.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $21.4M (vs $28.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$344K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$28.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.8M$10.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.4M$296K$10.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.7M$4.9M$6.5M$20.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$344K$344K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.1M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.7M$5.3M$8.0M$10.6M$10.6M$10.6M$10.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.2M$4.4M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$172K$344K$344K$344K$344K$344K$344K
Cumulative$0$7.7M$15.4M$22.9M$28.3M$28.3M$28.3M$28.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $28.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-51.5M$-51.5M-9.6%
Year 1$-53.0M+$18.9M$-34.2M-6.4%
Year 2$-54.6M+$28.3M$-26.3M-4.9%
Year 3$-56.3M+$28.3M$-28.0M-5.2%
Year 4$-57.9M+$28.3M$-29.6M-5.5%
Year 5$-59.7M+$28.3M$-31.4M-5.8%
$-514.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-345.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$169.6M
Value Created
$-31.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-82.0M
Organic Growth
$283.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-31.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.4M$8.1M$10.8M$12.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.3M$8.0M$10.6M$12.8M
A/R Days Reduction$3.3M$4.9M$6.5M$7.9M
Clean Claim Rate$172K$258K$344K$413K
Total$14.1M$21.2M$28.3M$34.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 54 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-9.6%-13.6%-7.2%-0.2%
P42
Net-to-Gross37.7%26.0%30.7%36.5%
P77
Occupancy87.3%55.7%67.5%79.1%
P91
Rev/Bed$2.8M$978K$1.4M$1.9M
P98
Exp/Bed$3.0M$975K$1.4M$2.1M
P96

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML