Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CARSON CITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 13:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CARSON CITY HOSPITAL
CCN 230208 | MI | 48 beds | Current EBITDA $-7.2M → Pro Forma $-4.9M (+$2.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$43.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-7.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-4.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

59%
Realization (C)
$2.3M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$952K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $2.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$875K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$867K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$533K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$28K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$875K$875K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$842K$24K$867K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$134K$398K$533K$1.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$28K$28K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$219K$438K$656K$875K$875K$875K$875K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$217K$433K$650K$867K$867K$867K$867K
A/R Days Reduction$0$178K$355K$533K$533K$533K$533K$533K
Clean Claim Rate$0$14K$28K$28K$28K$28K$28K$28K
Cumulative$0$627K$1.3M$1.9M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-7.2M$-7.2M-16.6%
Year 1$-7.5M+$1.5M$-5.9M-13.6%
Year 2$-7.7M+$2.3M$-5.4M-12.3%
Year 3$-7.9M+$2.3M$-5.6M-12.8%
Year 4$-8.2M+$2.3M$-5.9M-13.4%
Year 5$-8.4M+$2.3M$-6.1M-13.9%
$-72.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-67.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$5.4M
Value Created
$-6.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-11.5M
Organic Growth
$23.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-6.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$438K$656K$875K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$433K$650K$867K$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$266K$399K$533K$639K
Clean Claim Rate$14K$21K$28K$34K
Total$1.2M$1.7M$2.3M$2.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 75 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-16.6%-12.3%-3.3%7.5%
P11
Net-to-Gross34.7%31.2%37.1%46.3%
P41
Occupancy10.5%17.2%37.6%56.4%
P13
Rev/Bed$912K$652K$1.4M$2.2M
P33
Exp/Bed$1.1M$617K$1.5M$2.3M
P35

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML