Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MCLAREN OAKLAND 2026-04-26 03:56 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MCLAREN OAKLAND
CCN 230207 | MI | 107 beds | Current EBITDA $3.5M → Pro Forma $14.8M (+$11.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$214.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$11.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$14.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$8.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$11.3M
Modeled Uplift
$7.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.6M (vs $11.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$137K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$11.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.3M$4.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.1M$118K$4.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$658K$2.0M$2.6M$8.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$137K$137K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.2M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$870K$1.7M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$69K$137K$137K$137K$137K$137K$137K
Cumulative$0$3.1M$6.1M$9.1M$11.3M$11.3M$11.3M$11.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $11.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x96% / 28.7x100% / 32.2x105% / 35.8x107% / 37.6x108% / 39.4x
9.0x91% / 25.1x95% / 28.3x99% / 31.5x101% / 33.0x103% / 34.6x
10.0x86% / 22.3x91% / 25.1x95% / 28.0x97% / 29.4x99% / 30.8x
11.0x82% / 20.0x87% / 22.6x91% / 25.1x93% / 26.4x94% / 27.7x
12.0x78% / 18.1x83% / 20.4x87% / 22.8x89% / 24.0x91% / 25.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.5x
Headroom (turns)
69%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 69% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.0x, adding 6.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.5M$3.5M1.6%
Year 1$3.6M+$7.5M$11.1M5.2%
Year 2$3.7M+$11.3M$15.0M7.0%
Year 3$3.8M+$11.3M$15.1M7.1%
Year 4$4.0M+$11.3M$15.2M7.1%
Year 5$4.1M+$11.3M$15.4M7.2%
$35.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$168.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$133.7M
Value Created
$15.4M
Exit EBITDA
$5.6M
Organic Growth
$112.8M
RCM Value Creation
$15.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.1M$3.2M$4.3M$5.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.1M$3.2M$4.2M$5.1M
A/R Days Reduction$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$3.1M
Clean Claim Rate$69K$103K$137K$165K
Total$5.6M$8.5M$11.3M$13.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 49 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.6%-13.2%-5.9%4.0%
P71
Net-to-Gross38.7%25.4%31.2%39.0%
P71
Occupancy48.1%48.1%66.9%78.8%
P24
Rev/Bed$2.0M$429K$1.1M$1.9M
P79
Exp/Bed$2.0M$453K$1.2M$2.0M
P73

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML