Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER-CLARE 2026-04-26 13:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER-CLARE
CCN 230180 | MI | 49 beds | Current EBITDA $233K → Pro Forma $3.8M (+$3.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$67.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$233K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$3.6M
Modeled Uplift
$2.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.1M (vs $3.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$824K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$43K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.4M$1.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.3M$37K$1.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$208K$616K$824K$2.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$43K$43K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT43.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$339K$677K$1.0M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$335K$670K$1.0M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$275K$549K$824K$824K$824K$824K$824K
Clean Claim Rate$0$22K$43K$43K$43K$43K$43K$43K
Cumulative$0$970K$1.9M$2.9M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x159% / 116.8x165% / 130.2x170% / 143.5x172% / 150.2x175% / 156.9x
9.0x153% / 103.5x158% / 115.4x164% / 127.2x166% / 133.2x168% / 139.1x
10.0x147% / 92.8x153% / 103.5x158% / 114.2x160% / 119.5x163% / 124.8x
11.0x143% / 84.1x148% / 93.8x153% / 103.5x155% / 108.3x158% / 113.2x
12.0x138% / 76.8x144% / 85.7x148% / 94.6x151% / 99.0x153% / 103.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.0x
Headroom (turns)
92%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 92% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.5x, adding 7.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$233K$233K0.3%
Year 1$240K+$2.4M$2.6M3.9%
Year 2$248K+$3.6M$3.8M5.6%
Year 3$255K+$3.6M$3.8M5.6%
Year 4$263K+$3.6M$3.8M5.6%
Year 5$271K+$3.6M$3.8M5.7%
$2.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$42.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$39.8M
Value Created
$3.8M
Exit EBITDA
$372K
Organic Growth
$35.6M
RCM Value Creation
$3.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$677K$1.0M$1.4M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$670K$1.0M$1.3M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$412K$618K$824K$989K
Clean Claim Rate$22K$32K$43K$52K
Total$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$4.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 73 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.3%-12.4%-3.5%7.2%
P58
Net-to-Gross32.4%30.6%37.0%43.9%
P33
Occupancy12.9%17.7%39.0%59.8%
P18
Rev/Bed$1.4M$640K$1.4M$2.2M
P49
Exp/Bed$1.4M$614K$1.5M$2.3M
P44

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML