Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION ST JOHN HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION ST JOHN HOSPITAL
CCN 230165 | MI | 556 beds | Current EBITDA $-89.0M → Pro Forma $-40.1M (+$48.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$929.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-89.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$48.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-40.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$35.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$48.9M
Modeled Uplift
$33.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$15.9M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $33.0M (vs $48.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$18.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$18.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$11.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$595K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$48.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$18.6M$18.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$17.9M$511K$18.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.9M$8.5M$11.3M$35.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$595K$595K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$4.6M$9.3M$13.9M$18.6M$18.6M$18.6M$18.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$4.6M$9.2M$13.8M$18.4M$18.4M$18.4M$18.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.8M$7.5M$11.3M$11.3M$11.3M$11.3M$11.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$297K$595K$595K$595K$595K$595K$595K
Cumulative$0$13.3M$26.6M$39.6M$48.9M$48.9M$48.9M$48.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $48.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-89.0M$-89.0M-9.6%
Year 1$-91.6M+$32.6M$-59.1M-6.4%
Year 2$-94.4M+$48.9M$-45.5M-4.9%
Year 3$-97.2M+$48.9M$-48.3M-5.2%
Year 4$-100.1M+$48.9M$-51.3M-5.5%
Year 5$-103.1M+$48.9M$-54.3M-5.8%
$-889.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$-596.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$292.8M
Value Created
$-54.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-141.7M
Organic Growth
$488.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-54.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$9.3M$13.9M$18.6M$22.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$9.2M$13.8M$18.4M$22.1M
A/R Days Reduction$5.7M$8.5M$11.3M$13.6M
Clean Claim Rate$297K$446K$595K$714K
Total$24.4M$36.7M$48.9M$58.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 21 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-9.6%-9.6%-7.0%-1.4%
P24
Net-to-Gross32.1%26.3%30.3%32.1%
P67
Occupancy70.4%69.4%76.1%79.4%
P29
Rev/Bed$1.7M$1.2M$1.6M$2.1M
P52
Exp/Bed$1.8M$1.3M$1.7M$2.2M
P52

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML