Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MCLAREN FLINT 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MCLAREN FLINT
CCN 230141 | MI | 276 beds | Current EBITDA $-7.8M → Pro Forma $15.5M (+$23.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$443.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-7.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$23.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$15.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$17.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$23.3M
Modeled Uplift
$16.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $16.5M (vs $23.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$284K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$23.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.9M$8.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.5M$244K$8.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.4M$4.0M$5.4M$17.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$284K$284K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.2M$4.4M$6.7M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.2M$4.4M$6.6M$8.8M$8.8M$8.8M$8.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$142K$284K$284K$284K$284K$284K$284K
Cumulative$0$6.4M$12.7M$18.9M$23.3M$23.3M$23.3M$23.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $23.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-4.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
10.8x
Headroom (turns)
166%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 166% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -4.3x, adding 103.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-7.8M$-7.8M-1.8%
Year 1$-8.1M+$15.6M$7.5M1.7%
Year 2$-8.3M+$23.3M$15.0M3.4%
Year 3$-8.6M+$23.3M$14.8M3.3%
Year 4$-8.8M+$23.3M$14.5M3.3%
Year 5$-9.1M+$23.3M$14.3M3.2%
$-78.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$156.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$235.1M
Value Created
$14.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-12.5M
Organic Growth
$233.3M
RCM Value Creation
$14.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.4M$6.7M$8.9M$10.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.4M$6.6M$8.8M$10.5M
A/R Days Reduction$2.7M$4.0M$5.4M$6.5M
Clean Claim Rate$142K$213K$284K$341K
Total$11.7M$17.5M$23.3M$28.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 51 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.8%-13.3%-7.2%-0.7%
P67
Net-to-Gross27.7%26.6%30.2%34.0%
P33
Occupancy73.2%60.8%70.8%81.2%
P51
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.1M$1.5M$1.9M
P57
Exp/Bed$1.6M$1.2M$1.5M$2.1M
P53

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML