Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OTSEGO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 15:51 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OTSEGO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 230133 | MI | 46 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.5M → Pro Forma $2.2M (+$5.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$109.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$5.8M
Modeled Uplift
$3.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.7M (vs $5.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$70K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.2M$2.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.1M$60K$2.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$336K$995K$1.3M$4.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$70K$70K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$547K$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$541K$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$444K$887K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$35K$70K$70K$70K$70K$70K$70K
Cumulative$0$1.6M$3.1M$4.7M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-13.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
19.7x
Headroom (turns)
304%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 304% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -13.2x, adding 112.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.5M$-3.5M-3.2%
Year 1$-3.6M+$3.8M$220K0.2%
Year 2$-3.7M+$5.8M$2.0M1.9%
Year 3$-3.8M+$5.8M$1.9M1.8%
Year 4$-4.0M+$5.8M$1.8M1.6%
Year 5$-4.1M+$5.8M$1.7M1.5%
$-35.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$18.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$53.6M
Value Created
$1.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-5.6M
Organic Growth
$57.5M
RCM Value Creation
$1.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.6M
A/R Days Reduction$666K$998K$1.3M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$35K$53K$70K$84K
Total$2.9M$4.3M$5.8M$6.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 76 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.2%-12.3%-3.4%7.4%
P53
Net-to-Gross40.3%31.3%37.3%46.9%
P58
Occupancy30.3%17.2%37.8%57.7%
P43
Rev/Bed$2.4M$634K$1.4M$2.2M
P80
Exp/Bed$2.5M$612K$1.5M$2.3M
P82

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML