Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HURLEY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HURLEY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 230132 | MI | 369 beds | Current EBITDA $-105.0M → Pro Forma $-84.4M (+$20.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$391.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-105.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$20.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-84.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$15.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$20.6M
Modeled Uplift
$13.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $13.9M (vs $20.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$251K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$20.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.8M$7.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.5M$215K$7.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.6M$4.8M$15.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$251K$251K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.0M$3.9M$5.9M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.9M$3.9M$5.8M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$125K$251K$251K$251K$251K$251K$251K
Cumulative$0$5.6M$11.2M$16.7M$20.6M$20.6M$20.6M$20.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $20.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-105.0M$-105.0M-26.8%
Year 1$-108.1M+$13.7M$-94.4M-24.1%
Year 2$-111.4M+$20.6M$-90.8M-23.2%
Year 3$-114.7M+$20.6M$-94.1M-24.0%
Year 4$-118.1M+$20.6M$-97.5M-24.9%
Year 5$-121.7M+$20.6M$-101.1M-25.8%
$-1.05B
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.11B
Exit EV (11x)
$-62.3M
Value Created
$-101.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-167.2M
Organic Growth
$206.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-101.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.9M$5.9M$7.8M$9.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.9M$5.8M$7.8M$9.3M
A/R Days Reduction$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$5.7M
Clean Claim Rate$125K$188K$251K$301K
Total$10.3M$15.5M$20.6M$24.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 41 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-26.8%-12.7%-7.2%-1.8%
P10
Net-to-Gross26.3%26.3%30.2%34.0%
P24
Occupancy64.7%64.7%75.3%80.7%
P24
Rev/Bed$1.1M$1.2M$1.6M$2.1M
P12
Exp/Bed$1.3M$1.2M$1.7M$2.2M
P32

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML