Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HARPER- HUTZEL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HARPER- HUTZEL HOSPITAL
CCN 230104 | MI | 237 beds | Current EBITDA $-51.0M → Pro Forma $-31.2M (+$19.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$376.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-51.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$19.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-31.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$14.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$19.8M
Modeled Uplift
$14.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.2M (vs $19.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$241K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$19.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.5M$7.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.2M$207K$7.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.4M$4.6M$14.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$241K$241K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.6M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.9M$3.7M$5.6M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.5M$3.1M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$120K$241K$241K$241K$241K$241K$241K
Cumulative$0$5.4M$10.8M$16.1M$19.8M$19.8M$19.8M$19.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $19.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-51.0M$-51.0M-13.6%
Year 1$-52.5M+$13.2M$-39.3M-10.5%
Year 2$-54.1M+$19.8M$-34.3M-9.1%
Year 3$-55.7M+$19.8M$-35.9M-9.6%
Year 4$-57.4M+$19.8M$-37.6M-10.0%
Year 5$-59.1M+$19.8M$-39.3M-10.5%
$-510.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-432.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$77.4M
Value Created
$-39.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-81.3M
Organic Growth
$198.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-39.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.8M$5.6M$7.5M$9.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.7M$5.6M$7.5M$8.9M
A/R Days Reduction$2.3M$3.4M$4.6M$5.5M
Clean Claim Rate$120K$181K$241K$289K
Total$9.9M$14.8M$19.8M$23.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 52 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-13.6%-14.1%-7.2%-0.7%
P25
Net-to-Gross19.3%26.6%30.7%35.1%
P10
Occupancy76.2%60.2%68.4%79.6%
P65
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.1M$1.4M$1.9M
P55
Exp/Bed$1.8M$1.1M$1.4M$2.1M
P65

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML