Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SPECTRUM HEALTH BIG RAPIDS 2026-04-26 14:30 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SPECTRUM HEALTH BIG RAPIDS
CCN 230093 | MI | 49 beds | Current EBITDA $6.3M → Pro Forma $10.9M (+$4.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$87.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$10.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$4.6M
Modeled Uplift
$3.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.0M (vs $4.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$56K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.7M$1.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.7M$48K$1.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$268K$796K$1.1M$3.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$56K$56K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT43.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$437K$875K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$433K$866K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$355K$710K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$28K$56K$56K$56K$56K$56K$56K
Cumulative$0$1.3M$2.5M$3.7M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x60% / 10.6x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.6x70% / 14.4x72% / 15.2x
9.0x55% / 9.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.7x66% / 12.4x67% / 13.1x
10.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x
11.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x
12.0x43% / 6.0x47% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.6x
Headroom (turns)
25%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 25% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.9x, adding 3.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.3M$6.3M7.2%
Year 1$6.5M+$3.1M$9.6M11.0%
Year 2$6.7M+$4.6M$11.3M12.9%
Year 3$6.9M+$4.6M$11.5M13.2%
Year 4$7.1M+$4.6M$11.7M13.4%
Year 5$7.3M+$4.6M$11.9M13.6%
$63.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$131.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$68.0M
Value Created
$11.9M
Exit EBITDA
$10.1M
Organic Growth
$46.0M
RCM Value Creation
$11.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$875K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$866K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M
A/R Days Reduction$532K$799K$1.1M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$28K$42K$56K$67K
Total$2.3M$3.5M$4.6M$5.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 73 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.2%-12.4%-3.5%7.2%
P75
Net-to-Gross37.0%30.6%37.0%43.9%
P51
Occupancy40.2%17.7%39.0%59.8%
P52
Rev/Bed$1.8M$640K$1.4M$2.2M
P60
Exp/Bed$1.7M$614K$1.5M$2.3M
P59

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML