Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MUNSON HEALTHCARE CADILLAC HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:30 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MUNSON HEALTHCARE CADILLAC HOSPITAL
CCN 230081 | MI | 49 beds | Current EBITDA $1.2M → Pro Forma $7.6M (+$6.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$122.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$6.5M
Modeled Uplift
$4.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.0M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.4M (vs $6.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$78K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.5M$2.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.4M$67K$2.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$376K$1.1M$1.5M$4.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$78K$78K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT43.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$613K$1.2M$1.8M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$607K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$498K$995K$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$39K$78K$78K$78K$78K$78K$78K
Cumulative$0$1.8M$3.5M$5.2M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x114% / 44.7x119% / 50.0x123% / 55.3x125% / 58.0x127% / 60.6x
9.0x108% / 39.3x113% / 44.1x118% / 48.8x120% / 51.2x122% / 53.5x
10.0x104% / 35.1x108% / 39.3x113% / 43.6x115% / 45.7x117% / 47.9x
11.0x100% / 31.6x104% / 35.5x108% / 39.3x110% / 41.3x112% / 43.2x
12.0x96% / 28.7x100% / 32.2x105% / 35.8x107% / 37.6x108% / 39.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.2x
Headroom (turns)
80%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 80% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.3x, adding 7.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.2M$1.2M1.0%
Year 1$1.2M+$4.3M$5.5M4.5%
Year 2$1.3M+$6.5M$7.7M6.3%
Year 3$1.3M+$6.5M$7.8M6.3%
Year 4$1.3M+$6.5M$7.8M6.4%
Year 5$1.4M+$6.5M$7.8M6.4%
$12.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$86.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$74.3M
Value Created
$7.8M
Exit EBITDA
$1.9M
Organic Growth
$64.5M
RCM Value Creation
$7.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.2M$1.8M$2.5M$2.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
A/R Days Reduction$746K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$39K$59K$78K$94K
Total$3.2M$4.8M$6.5M$7.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 73 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.0%-12.4%-3.5%7.2%
P60
Net-to-Gross31.9%30.6%37.0%43.9%
P30
Occupancy47.5%17.7%39.0%59.8%
P64
Rev/Bed$2.5M$640K$1.4M$2.2M
P84
Exp/Bed$2.5M$614K$1.5M$2.3M
P82

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML