Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SPECTRUM HEALTH HOSPITALS 2026-04-26 04:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SPECTRUM HEALTH HOSPITALS
CCN 230038 | MI | 1103 beds | Current EBITDA $1.2M → Pro Forma $136.6M (+$135.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$2.57B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$135.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$136.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$98.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$135.4M
Modeled Uplift
$87.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$47.8M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $87.6M (vs $135.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$51.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$51.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$31.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$1.6M
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$135.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$51.5M$51.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$49.5M$1.4M$51.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$7.9M$23.4M$31.3M$98.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$1.6M$1.6M$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$12.9M$25.7M$38.6M$51.5M$51.5M$51.5M$51.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$12.7M$25.5M$38.2M$51.0M$51.0M$51.0M$51.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$10.4M$20.9M$31.3M$31.3M$31.3M$31.3M$31.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$824K$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Cumulative$0$36.9M$73.7M$109.8M$135.4M$135.4M$135.4M$135.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $135.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x285% / 841.6x293% / 935.5x300% / 1029.3x304% / 1076.3x307% / 1123.2x
9.0x276% / 747.7x284% / 831.2x291% / 914.6x295% / 956.3x298% / 998.0x
10.0x268% / 672.6x276% / 747.7x283% / 822.8x286% / 860.4x290% / 897.9x
11.0x261% / 611.2x268% / 679.5x276% / 747.7x279% / 781.9x282% / 816.0x
12.0x255% / 560.0x262% / 622.6x269% / 685.1x272% / 716.4x276% / 747.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.4x
Headroom (turns)
99%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 99% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.1x, adding 8.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.2M$1.2M0.0%
Year 1$1.2M+$90.3M$91.5M3.6%
Year 2$1.3M+$135.4M$136.7M5.3%
Year 3$1.3M+$135.4M$136.7M5.3%
Year 4$1.3M+$135.4M$136.7M5.3%
Year 5$1.4M+$135.4M$136.8M5.3%
$11.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.50B
Exit EV (11x)
$1.49B
Value Created
$136.8M
Exit EBITDA
$1.9M
Organic Growth
$1.35B
RCM Value Creation
$136.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$25.7M$38.6M$51.5M$61.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$25.5M$38.2M$51.0M$61.2M
A/R Days Reduction$15.7M$23.5M$31.3M$37.6M
Clean Claim Rate$824K$1.2M$1.6M$2.0M
Total$67.7M$101.6M$135.4M$162.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 213 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.0%-15.5%-4.5%4.5%
P61
Net-to-Gross42.4%20.9%26.8%31.2%
P92
Occupancy79.4%70.4%78.3%86.6%
P54
Rev/Bed$2.3M$1.5M$2.0M$2.7M
P64
Exp/Bed$2.3M$1.5M$2.1M$3.0M
P60

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML