Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TRINITY HEALTH OAKLAND 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TRINITY HEALTH OAKLAND
CCN 230029 | MI | 333 beds | Current EBITDA $-34.8M → Pro Forma $-9.5M (+$25.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$480.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-34.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$25.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-9.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$18.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$25.3M
Modeled Uplift
$17.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $17.8M (vs $25.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$308K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$25.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.6M$9.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$9.2M$264K$9.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.5M$4.4M$5.8M$18.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$308K$308K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.4M$4.8M$7.2M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.4M$4.8M$7.1M$9.5M$9.5M$9.5M$9.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.9M$3.9M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$154K$308K$308K$308K$308K$308K$308K
Cumulative$0$6.9M$13.8M$20.5M$25.3M$25.3M$25.3M$25.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $25.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-34.8M$-34.8M-7.2%
Year 1$-35.9M+$16.9M$-19.0M-4.0%
Year 2$-36.9M+$25.3M$-11.7M-2.4%
Year 3$-38.0M+$25.3M$-12.8M-2.7%
Year 4$-39.2M+$25.3M$-13.9M-2.9%
Year 5$-40.4M+$25.3M$-15.1M-3.1%
$-348.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-165.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$182.2M
Value Created
$-15.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-55.5M
Organic Growth
$252.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-15.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.8M$7.2M$9.6M$11.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.8M$7.1M$9.5M$11.4M
A/R Days Reduction$2.9M$4.4M$5.8M$7.0M
Clean Claim Rate$154K$231K$308K$369K
Total$12.6M$19.0M$25.3M$30.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 44 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-7.2%-12.8%-7.2%-1.3%
P48
Net-to-Gross30.7%26.7%30.5%34.2%
P52
Occupancy76.1%61.3%74.2%81.6%
P57
Rev/Bed$1.4M$1.1M$1.5M$2.0M
P45
Exp/Bed$1.5M$1.2M$1.6M$2.1M
P48

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML