Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PONTIAC GENERAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PONTIAC GENERAL HOSPITAL
CCN 230013 | MI | 47 beds | Current EBITDA $-5.8M → Pro Forma $-4.6M (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$23.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-5.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-4.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$894K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

57%
Realization (C)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$695K
Risk-Adjusted
-$531K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 57% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Payer Diversity, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$466K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$461K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$283K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$15K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$466K$466K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$448K$13K$461K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$71K$212K$283K$894K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$15K$15K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$116K$233K$349K$466K$466K$466K$466K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$115K$231K$346K$461K$461K$461K$461K
A/R Days Reduction$0$94K$189K$283K$283K$283K$283K$283K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K
Cumulative$0$334K$668K$994K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-5.8M$-5.8M-25.1%
Year 1$-6.0M+$817K$-5.2M-22.3%
Year 2$-6.2M+$1.2M$-5.0M-21.3%
Year 3$-6.4M+$1.2M$-5.2M-22.1%
Year 4$-6.6M+$1.2M$-5.3M-23.0%
Year 5$-6.8M+$1.2M$-5.5M-23.8%
$-58.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$-61.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$-2.6M
Value Created
$-5.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-9.3M
Organic Growth
$12.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-5.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$233K$349K$466K$559K
Denial Rate Reductio$231K$346K$461K$554K
A/R Days Reduction$142K$213K$283K$340K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$11K$15K$18K
Total$613K$919K$1.2M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 75 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-25.1%-12.3%-3.3%7.5%
P4
Net-to-Gross22.4%31.2%37.1%46.3%
P11
Occupancy2.0%17.2%37.6%56.4%
P4
Rev/Bed$496K$652K$1.4M$2.2M
P16
Exp/Bed$620K$617K$1.5M$2.3M
P25

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML