Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MIRAVISTA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER 2026-04-26 07:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MIRAVISTA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER
CCN 224046 | MA | 114 beds | Current EBITDA $-17.7M → Pro Forma $-16.7M (+$1.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$19.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-17.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-16.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$755K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$1.0M
Modeled Uplift
$676K
Risk-Adjusted
-$360K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$394K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$390K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$240K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$13K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$394K$394K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$379K$11K$390K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$60K$179K$240K$755K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$13K$13K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT54.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$98K$197K$295K$394K$394K$394K$394K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$97K$195K$292K$390K$390K$390K$390K
A/R Days Reduction$0$80K$160K$240K$240K$240K$240K$240K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K
Cumulative$0$282K$564K$840K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-17.7M$-17.7M-89.9%
Year 1$-18.2M+$691K$-17.5M-89.1%
Year 2$-18.8M+$1.0M$-17.8M-90.1%
Year 3$-19.4M+$1.0M$-18.3M-93.0%
Year 4$-19.9M+$1.0M$-18.9M-96.0%
Year 5$-20.5M+$1.0M$-19.5M-99.0%
$-177.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-214.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$-37.3M
Value Created
$-19.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-28.2M
Organic Growth
$10.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-19.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$197K$295K$394K$473K
Denial Rate Reductio$195K$292K$390K$468K
A/R Days Reduction$120K$180K$240K$288K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$13K$15K
Total$518K$777K$1.0M$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 58 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-18.4%-10.7%0.5%
P0
Net-to-Gross34.9%35.6%43.5%54.5%
P21
Occupancy51.6%58.7%66.5%81.3%
P17
Rev/Bed$173K$376K$1.1M$1.7M
P2
Exp/Bed$328K$331K$1.3M$1.9M
P24

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML