Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HAVERHILL PAVILION 2026-04-26 11:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HAVERHILL PAVILION
CCN 224039 | MA | 71 beds | Current EBITDA $458K → Pro Forma $1.6M (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$22.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$458K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$849K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$845K
Risk-Adjusted
-$319K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$443K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$438K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$269K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$14K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$443K$443K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$426K$12K$438K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$68K$201K$269K$849K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$14K$14K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$111K$221K$332K$443K$443K$443K$443K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$110K$219K$329K$438K$438K$438K$438K
A/R Days Reduction$0$90K$180K$269K$269K$269K$269K$269K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K
Cumulative$0$317K$634K$944K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x89% / 23.8x93% / 26.8x97% / 29.8x99% / 31.3x101% / 32.8x
9.0x84% / 20.8x88% / 23.5x92% / 26.1x94% / 27.5x96% / 28.8x
10.0x79% / 18.4x84% / 20.8x88% / 23.2x89% / 24.4x91% / 25.6x
11.0x75% / 16.4x79% / 18.6x84% / 20.8x85% / 21.9x87% / 23.0x
12.0x71% / 14.8x76% / 16.8x80% / 18.8x82% / 19.8x84% / 20.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.1x
Headroom (turns)
63%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 63% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.4x, adding 6.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$458K$458K2.1%
Year 1$472K+$776K$1.2M5.6%
Year 2$486K+$1.2M$1.7M7.5%
Year 3$501K+$1.2M$1.7M7.5%
Year 4$516K+$1.2M$1.7M7.6%
Year 5$531K+$1.2M$1.7M7.7%
$4.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$18.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$14.1M
Value Created
$1.7M
Exit EBITDA
$730K
Organic Growth
$11.6M
RCM Value Creation
$1.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$221K$332K$443K$531K
Denial Rate Reductio$219K$329K$438K$526K
A/R Days Reduction$135K$202K$269K$323K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$11K$14K$17K
Total$582K$873K$1.2M$1.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 43 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.1%-19.4%-11.8%0.5%
P75
Net-to-Gross71.0%35.9%45.2%60.6%
P92
Occupancy89.0%58.1%67.8%84.3%
P84
Rev/Bed$312K$354K$893K$1.3M
P15
Exp/Bed$305K$333K$800K$1.5M
P12

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML