Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PEMBROKE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:06 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PEMBROKE HOSPITAL
CCN 224023 | MA | 120 beds | Current EBITDA $5.0M → Pro Forma $6.8M (+$1.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$33.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$1.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$569K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.2M (vs $1.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$671K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$665K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$408K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$21K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$671K$671K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$646K$18K$665K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$103K$305K$408K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$21K$21K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$168K$336K$503K$671K$671K$671K$671K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$166K$332K$498K$665K$665K$665K$665K
A/R Days Reduction$0$136K$272K$408K$408K$408K$408K$408K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K
Cumulative$0$481K$962K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x
9.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x
10.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
11.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x
12.0x33% / 4.1x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.2x
Headroom (turns)
4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.3x, adding 2.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.0M$5.0M14.9%
Year 1$5.2M+$1.2M$6.3M18.9%
Year 2$5.3M+$1.8M$7.1M21.1%
Year 3$5.5M+$1.8M$7.2M21.6%
Year 4$5.6M+$1.8M$7.4M22.0%
Year 5$5.8M+$1.8M$7.6M22.6%
$50.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$83.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$33.2M
Value Created
$7.6M
Exit EBITDA
$8.0M
Organic Growth
$17.7M
RCM Value Creation
$7.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$336K$503K$671K$805K
Denial Rate Reductio$332K$498K$665K$797K
A/R Days Reduction$204K$306K$408K$490K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$16K$21K$26K
Total$883K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 59 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin14.9%-18.4%-11.3%0.2%
P88
Net-to-Gross66.8%35.3%43.3%53.8%
P86
Occupancy67.8%59.3%66.6%81.2%
P53
Rev/Bed$280K$380K$1.1M$1.7M
P9
Exp/Bed$238K$333K$1.3M$1.9M
P2

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML