Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HUMAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE 2026-04-26 06:17 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HUMAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE
CCN 224018 | MA | 64 beds | Current EBITDA $8.6M → Pro Forma $10.3M (+$1.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$32.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$10.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$1.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$447K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $1.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$655K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$649K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$399K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$21K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$655K$655K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$631K$18K$649K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$101K$298K$399K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$21K$21K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$164K$328K$492K$655K$655K$655K$655K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$162K$324K$487K$649K$649K$649K$649K
A/R Days Reduction$0$133K$266K$399K$399K$399K$399K$399K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K
Cumulative$0$469K$939K$1.4M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.0x
9.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x54% / 8.5x
10.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x
12.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.1x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.6M$8.6M26.3%
Year 1$8.9M+$1.1M$10.0M30.5%
Year 2$9.1M+$1.7M$10.9M33.1%
Year 3$9.4M+$1.7M$11.1M33.9%
Year 4$9.7M+$1.7M$11.4M34.8%
Year 5$10.0M+$1.7M$11.7M35.7%
$86.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$128.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$42.6M
Value Created
$11.7M
Exit EBITDA
$13.7M
Organic Growth
$17.2M
RCM Value Creation
$11.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$328K$492K$655K$787K
Denial Rate Reductio$324K$487K$649K$779K
A/R Days Reduction$199K$299K$399K$479K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$16K$21K$25K
Total$862K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 41 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin26.3%-18.2%-11.8%-0.4%
P97
Net-to-Gross65.9%36.3%45.9%60.1%
P82
Occupancy94.2%57.8%66.3%82.8%
P90
Rev/Bed$512K$336K$829K$1.4M
P37
Exp/Bed$378K$338K$800K$1.5M
P32

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML