Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHILDRENS HOSPITAL CORPORATION 2026-04-26 02:15 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHILDRENS HOSPITAL CORPORATION
CCN 223302 | MA | 485 beds | Current EBITDA $-431.2M → Pro Forma $-347.8M (+$83.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.59B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-431.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$83.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-347.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$60.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$83.4M
Modeled Uplift
$59.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$24.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $59.4M (vs $83.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$31.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$31.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$19.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$1.0M
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$83.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$31.7M$31.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$30.5M$872K$31.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$4.9M$14.4M$19.3M$60.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$1.0M$1.0M$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$7.9M$15.9M$23.8M$31.7M$31.7M$31.7M$31.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$7.9M$15.7M$23.6M$31.4M$31.4M$31.4M$31.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$6.4M$12.9M$19.3M$19.3M$19.3M$19.3M$19.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$508K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Cumulative$0$22.7M$45.4M$67.7M$83.4M$83.4M$83.4M$83.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $83.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-431.2M$-431.2M-27.2%
Year 1$-444.1M+$55.6M$-388.5M-24.5%
Year 2$-457.5M+$83.4M$-374.0M-23.6%
Year 3$-471.2M+$83.4M$-387.8M-24.4%
Year 4$-485.3M+$83.4M$-401.9M-25.3%
Year 5$-499.9M+$83.4M$-416.5M-26.3%
$-4.31B
Entry EV (10x)
$-4.58B
Exit EV (11x)
$-268.9M
Value Created
$-416.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-686.8M
Organic Growth
$834.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-416.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$15.9M$23.8M$31.7M$38.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$15.7M$23.6M$31.4M$37.7M
A/R Days Reduction$9.6M$14.5M$19.3M$23.2M
Clean Claim Rate$508K$761K$1.0M$1.2M
Total$41.7M$62.6M$83.4M$100.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 20 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-27.2%-32.6%-18.9%-12.0%
P35
Net-to-Gross50.1%34.0%42.4%50.1%
P71
Occupancy73.4%70.1%83.2%95.6%
P30
Rev/Bed$3.3M$1.3M$1.9M$2.7M
P88
Exp/Bed$4.2M$1.1M$1.9M$3.2M
P85

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML