Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SAINT VINCENT HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SAINT VINCENT HOSPITAL
CCN 220176 | MA | 232 beds | Current EBITDA $781K → Pro Forma $22.0M (+$21.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$404.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$781K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$21.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$22.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$15.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$21.3M
Modeled Uplift
$15.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $15.2M (vs $21.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$259K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$21.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.1M$8.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.8M$222K$8.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.7M$4.9M$15.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$259K$259K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.0M$4.0M$6.1M$8.1M$8.1M$8.1M$8.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.0M$4.0M$6.0M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.6M$3.3M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$129K$259K$259K$259K$259K$259K$259K
Cumulative$0$5.8M$11.6M$17.2M$21.3M$21.3M$21.3M$21.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $21.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x190% / 204.4x196% / 227.4x202% / 250.5x205% / 262.1x207% / 273.6x
9.0x183% / 181.3x189% / 201.8x195% / 222.3x197% / 232.6x200% / 242.8x
10.0x177% / 162.8x183% / 181.3x188% / 199.8x191% / 209.0x194% / 218.2x
11.0x172% / 147.8x177% / 164.5x183% / 181.3x186% / 189.7x188% / 198.1x
12.0x167% / 135.2x173% / 150.6x178% / 165.9x180% / 173.6x183% / 181.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.2x
Headroom (turns)
95%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 95% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.3x, adding 8.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$781K$781K0.2%
Year 1$804K+$14.2M$15.0M3.7%
Year 2$828K+$21.3M$22.1M5.5%
Year 3$853K+$21.3M$22.1M5.5%
Year 4$879K+$21.3M$22.1M5.5%
Year 5$905K+$21.3M$22.2M5.5%
$7.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$243.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$236.0M
Value Created
$22.2M
Exit EBITDA
$1.2M
Organic Growth
$212.6M
RCM Value Creation
$22.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.0M$6.1M$8.1M$9.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.0M$6.0M$8.0M$9.6M
A/R Days Reduction$2.5M$3.7M$4.9M$5.9M
Clean Claim Rate$129K$194K$259K$310K
Total$10.6M$15.9M$21.3M$25.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 46 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.2%-21.1%-9.8%-0.9%
P75
Net-to-Gross19.5%35.1%43.0%49.9%
P2
Occupancy73.1%61.0%70.4%81.8%
P57
Rev/Bed$1.7M$883K$1.6M$1.9M
P57
Exp/Bed$1.7M$955K$1.7M$2.1M
P50

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML