Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS - PLYMOUTH 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS - PLYMOUTH
CCN 220060 | MA | 150 beds | Current EBITDA $8.9M → Pro Forma $27.3M (+$18.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$349.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$18.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$27.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$13.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

77%
Realization (B)
$18.4M
Modeled Uplift
$14.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 77% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.1M (vs $18.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$223K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$18.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.0M$7.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.7M$192K$6.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.2M$4.2M$13.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$223K$223K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.7M$3.5M$5.2M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.7M$3.5M$5.2M$6.9M$6.9M$6.9M$6.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$112K$223K$223K$223K$223K$223K$223K
Cumulative$0$5.0M$10.0M$14.9M$18.4M$18.4M$18.4M$18.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $18.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x83% / 20.3x87% / 22.9x91% / 25.5x93% / 26.8x95% / 28.1x
9.0x78% / 17.7x82% / 20.0x86% / 22.3x88% / 23.5x90% / 24.6x
10.0x73% / 15.6x78% / 17.7x82% / 19.8x84% / 20.8x85% / 21.9x
11.0x69% / 13.9x74% / 15.8x78% / 17.7x79% / 18.6x81% / 19.6x
12.0x66% / 12.4x70% / 14.2x74% / 15.9x76% / 16.8x78% / 17.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.7x
Headroom (turns)
57%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 57% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.8x, adding 5.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.9M$8.9M2.6%
Year 1$9.2M+$12.2M$21.4M6.1%
Year 2$9.5M+$18.4M$27.8M8.0%
Year 3$9.8M+$18.4M$28.1M8.1%
Year 4$10.0M+$18.4M$28.4M8.1%
Year 5$10.3M+$18.4M$28.7M8.2%
$89.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$315.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$226.6M
Value Created
$28.7M
Exit EBITDA
$14.2M
Organic Growth
$183.7M
RCM Value Creation
$28.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.5M$5.2M$7.0M$8.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.5M$5.2M$6.9M$8.3M
A/R Days Reduction$2.1M$3.2M$4.2M$5.1M
Clean Claim Rate$112K$168K$223K$268K
Total$9.2M$13.8M$18.4M$22.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 58 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.6%-18.4%-10.7%-0.9%
P80
Net-to-Gross42.9%35.6%43.2%53.1%
P46
Occupancy91.0%59.5%67.5%80.3%
P91
Rev/Bed$2.3M$383K$1.2M$1.8M
P91
Exp/Bed$2.3M$341K$1.3M$2.0M
P86

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML