Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BERKSHIRE MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BERKSHIRE MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 220046 | MA | 238 beds | Current EBITDA $-67.5M → Pro Forma $-40.0M (+$27.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$522.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-67.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$27.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-40.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$20.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$27.5M
Modeled Uplift
$19.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $19.1M (vs $27.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$335K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$27.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.5M$10.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.1M$288K$10.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.6M$4.8M$6.4M$20.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$335K$335K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.6M$5.2M$7.8M$10.5M$10.5M$10.5M$10.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.6M$5.2M$7.8M$10.4M$10.4M$10.4M$10.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$167K$335K$335K$335K$335K$335K$335K
Cumulative$0$7.5M$15.0M$22.3M$27.5M$27.5M$27.5M$27.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $27.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-67.5M$-67.5M-12.9%
Year 1$-69.5M+$18.3M$-51.1M-9.8%
Year 2$-71.6M+$27.5M$-44.1M-8.4%
Year 3$-73.7M+$27.5M$-46.2M-8.8%
Year 4$-75.9M+$27.5M$-48.4M-9.3%
Year 5$-78.2M+$27.5M$-50.7M-9.7%
$-674.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-557.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$116.9M
Value Created
$-50.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-107.4M
Organic Growth
$275.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-50.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.2M$7.8M$10.5M$12.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.2M$7.8M$10.4M$12.4M
A/R Days Reduction$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$7.6M
Clean Claim Rate$167K$251K$335K$402K
Total$13.8M$20.6M$27.5M$33.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 44 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-12.9%-26.4%-9.8%-1.3%
P33
Net-to-Gross44.2%35.0%43.0%50.4%
P57
Occupancy61.3%61.1%70.6%82.9%
P27
Rev/Bed$2.2M$881K$1.6M$1.8M
P86
Exp/Bed$2.5M$831K$1.7M$2.1M
P84

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML