Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 02:15 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 220031 | MA | 440 beds | Current EBITDA $-936.9M → Pro Forma $-874.0M (+$62.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.19B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-936.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$62.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-874.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$45.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$62.8M
Modeled Uplift
$47.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$15.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $47.1M (vs $62.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$23.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$23.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$14.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$764K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$62.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$23.9M$23.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$23.0M$657K$23.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.7M$10.9M$14.5M$45.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$764K$764K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$6.0M$11.9M$17.9M$23.9M$23.9M$23.9M$23.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$5.9M$11.8M$17.7M$23.6M$23.6M$23.6M$23.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$4.8M$9.7M$14.5M$14.5M$14.5M$14.5M$14.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$382K$764K$764K$764K$764K$764K$764K
Cumulative$0$17.1M$34.2M$50.9M$62.8M$62.8M$62.8M$62.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $62.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-936.9M$-936.9M-78.4%
Year 1$-965.0M+$41.9M$-923.1M-77.3%
Year 2$-993.9M+$62.8M$-931.1M-78.0%
Year 3$-1.02B+$62.8M$-960.9M-80.5%
Year 4$-1.05B+$62.8M$-991.6M-83.0%
Year 5$-1.09B+$62.8M$-1.02B-85.7%
$-9.37B
Entry EV (10x)
$-11.26B
Exit EV (11x)
$-1.89B
Value Created
$-1.02B
Exit EBITDA
$-1.49B
Organic Growth
$628.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-1.02B
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$11.9M$17.9M$23.9M$28.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$11.8M$17.7M$23.6M$28.4M
A/R Days Reduction$7.3M$10.9M$14.5M$17.4M
Clean Claim Rate$382K$573K$764K$917K
Total$31.4M$47.1M$62.8M$75.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 24 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-32.6%-16.0%-5.0%
P0
Net-to-Gross37.8%34.0%41.1%49.6%
P38
Occupancy95.1%68.7%79.8%95.1%
P71
Rev/Bed$2.7M$1.6M$1.9M$2.6M
P76
Exp/Bed$4.8M$1.4M$2.1M$3.2M
P96

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML