Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — COOLEY DICKINSON HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — COOLEY DICKINSON HOSPITAL
CCN 220015 | MA | 118 beds | Current EBITDA $5.3M → Pro Forma $17.6M (+$12.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$233.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$12.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$17.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$9.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$12.3M
Modeled Uplift
$8.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $8.7M (vs $12.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$150K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$12.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.7M$4.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.5M$128K$4.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$717K$2.1M$2.8M$9.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$150K$150K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT55.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.5M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.5M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$948K$1.9M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$75K$150K$150K$150K$150K$150K$150K
Cumulative$0$3.3M$6.7M$10.0M$12.3M$12.3M$12.3M$12.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $12.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x86% / 22.1x90% / 24.9x94% / 27.8x96% / 29.2x98% / 30.6x
9.0x81% / 19.3x85% / 21.8x89% / 24.3x91% / 25.6x93% / 26.8x
10.0x76% / 17.1x81% / 19.3x85% / 21.6x87% / 22.7x89% / 23.8x
11.0x72% / 15.2x77% / 17.2x81% / 19.3x83% / 20.3x84% / 21.4x
12.0x69% / 13.7x73% / 15.5x77% / 17.4x79% / 18.4x81% / 19.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.9x
Headroom (turns)
61%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 61% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.6x, adding 5.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.3M$5.3M2.3%
Year 1$5.5M+$8.2M$13.7M5.9%
Year 2$5.6M+$12.3M$17.9M7.7%
Year 3$5.8M+$12.3M$18.1M7.7%
Year 4$6.0M+$12.3M$18.3M7.8%
Year 5$6.2M+$12.3M$18.5M7.9%
$53.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$203.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$149.8M
Value Created
$18.5M
Exit EBITDA
$8.5M
Organic Growth
$122.9M
RCM Value Creation
$18.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.3M$3.5M$4.7M$5.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.3M$3.5M$4.6M$5.6M
A/R Days Reduction$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.4M
Clean Claim Rate$75K$112K$150K$179K
Total$6.1M$9.2M$12.3M$14.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 57 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.3%-18.5%-11.3%1.1%
P76
Net-to-Gross35.3%35.1%43.3%55.2%
P25
Occupancy61.4%59.3%66.6%80.9%
P39
Rev/Bed$2.0M$371K$1.1M$1.7M
P87
Exp/Bed$1.9M$328K$1.3M$1.8M
P75

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML