Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CAMBRIDGE HEALTH ALLIANCE 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CAMBRIDGE HEALTH ALLIANCE
CCN 220011 | MA | 225 beds | Current EBITDA $30.7M → Pro Forma $50.9M (+$20.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$383.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$30.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$20.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$50.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$14.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$20.2M
Modeled Uplift
$13.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.8M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $13.4M (vs $20.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$246K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$20.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.7M$7.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.4M$211K$7.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.5M$4.7M$14.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$246K$246K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.8M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.7M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.6M$3.1M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$123K$246K$246K$246K$246K$246K$246K
Cumulative$0$5.5M$11.0M$16.4M$20.2M$20.2M$20.2M$20.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $20.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.5x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.5x
9.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x
10.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.7x60% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
11.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
12.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.4x
Headroom (turns)
21%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 21% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.1x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$30.7M$30.7M8.0%
Year 1$31.6M+$13.5M$45.1M11.7%
Year 2$32.6M+$20.2M$52.8M13.7%
Year 3$33.6M+$20.2M$53.8M14.0%
Year 4$34.6M+$20.2M$54.8M14.3%
Year 5$35.6M+$20.2M$55.8M14.5%
$307.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$613.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$306.7M
Value Created
$55.8M
Exit EBITDA
$48.9M
Organic Growth
$202.0M
RCM Value Creation
$55.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.8M$5.8M$7.7M$9.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.8M$5.7M$7.6M$9.1M
A/R Days Reduction$2.3M$3.5M$4.7M$5.6M
Clean Claim Rate$123K$184K$246K$295K
Total$10.1M$15.1M$20.2M$24.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 49 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-28.9%-11.3%-1.4%
P0
Net-to-Gross36.1%35.1%42.9%49.3%
P28
Occupancy49.7%60.4%70.4%81.9%
P8
Rev/Bed$1.7M$800K$1.5M$1.8M
P55
Exp/Bed$4.2M$542K$1.6M$2.1M
P96

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML