Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LAWRENCE GENERAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:41 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LAWRENCE GENERAL HOSPITAL
CCN 220010 | MA | 186 beds | Current EBITDA $-35.3M → Pro Forma $-20.1M (+$15.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$289.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-35.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-20.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$15.2M
Modeled Uplift
$10.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.7M (vs $15.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$185K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.8M$5.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.6M$159K$5.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$888K$2.6M$3.5M$11.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$185K$185K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$93K$185K$185K$185K$185K$185K$185K
Cumulative$0$4.1M$8.3M$12.3M$15.2M$15.2M$15.2M$15.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-35.3M$-35.3M-12.2%
Year 1$-36.3M+$10.1M$-26.2M-9.1%
Year 2$-37.4M+$15.2M$-22.2M-7.7%
Year 3$-38.5M+$15.2M$-23.3M-8.1%
Year 4$-39.7M+$15.2M$-24.5M-8.5%
Year 5$-40.9M+$15.2M$-25.7M-8.9%
$-352.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$-282.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$70.3M
Value Created
$-25.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-56.2M
Organic Growth
$152.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-25.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.9M$4.3M$5.8M$6.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.9M$4.3M$5.7M$6.9M
A/R Days Reduction$1.8M$2.6M$3.5M$4.2M
Clean Claim Rate$93K$139K$185K$222K
Total$7.6M$11.4M$15.2M$18.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 53 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-12.2%-18.1%-8.4%0.4%
P39
Net-to-Gross43.0%38.9%43.7%53.3%
P43
Occupancy67.2%60.2%69.0%81.9%
P45
Rev/Bed$1.6M$395K$1.3M$1.8M
P59
Exp/Bed$1.7M$351K$1.5M$2.0M
P64

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML