Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FORT WASHINGTON MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:32 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FORT WASHINGTON MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 210060 | MD | 30 beds | Current EBITDA $-6.9M → Pro Forma $-3.9M (+$3.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$57.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-6.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-3.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$3.0M
Modeled Uplift
$2.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$777K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.2M (vs $3.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$694K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$37K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.1M$31K$1.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$175K$519K$694K$2.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$37K$37K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT57.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$285K$571K$856K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$283K$565K$848K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$231K$463K$694K$694K$694K$694K$694K
Clean Claim Rate$0$18K$37K$37K$37K$37K$37K$37K
Cumulative$0$818K$1.6M$2.4M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-6.9M$-6.9M-12.0%
Year 1$-7.1M+$2.0M$-5.1M-8.9%
Year 2$-7.3M+$3.0M$-4.3M-7.5%
Year 3$-7.5M+$3.0M$-4.5M-7.9%
Year 4$-7.7M+$3.0M$-4.7M-8.3%
Year 5$-8.0M+$3.0M$-5.0M-8.7%
$-68.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$-54.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$14.1M
Value Created
$-5.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-10.9M
Organic Growth
$30.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-5.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$571K$856K$1.1M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$565K$848K$1.1M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$347K$521K$694K$833K
Clean Claim Rate$18K$27K$37K$44K
Total$1.5M$2.3M$3.0M$3.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 2684 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-12.0%-18.1%-5.8%4.9%
P36
Net-to-Gross77.0%30.0%43.1%57.8%
P93
Occupancy81.4%20.8%37.1%59.4%
P92
Rev/Bed$1.9M$479K$949K$1.9M
P76
Exp/Bed$2.1M$509K$1.1M$2.0M
P78

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML