Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:49 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL
CCN 210004 | MD | 399 beds | Current EBITDA $-86.3M → Pro Forma $-59.2M (+$27.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$516.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-86.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$27.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-59.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$19.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$27.1M
Modeled Uplift
$18.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $18.8M (vs $27.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$330K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$27.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.3M$10.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$9.9M$284K$10.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.6M$4.7M$6.3M$19.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$330K$330K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT84.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.6M$5.2M$7.7M$10.3M$10.3M$10.3M$10.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.6M$5.1M$7.7M$10.2M$10.2M$10.2M$10.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$165K$330K$330K$330K$330K$330K$330K
Cumulative$0$7.4M$14.8M$22.0M$27.1M$27.1M$27.1M$27.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $27.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-86.3M$-86.3M-16.7%
Year 1$-88.9M+$18.1M$-70.8M-13.7%
Year 2$-91.6M+$27.1M$-64.4M-12.5%
Year 3$-94.3M+$27.1M$-67.2M-13.0%
Year 4$-97.1M+$27.1M$-70.0M-13.6%
Year 5$-100.1M+$27.1M$-72.9M-14.1%
$-863.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-802.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$61.1M
Value Created
$-72.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-137.5M
Organic Growth
$271.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-72.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.2M$7.7M$10.3M$12.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.1M$7.7M$10.2M$12.3M
A/R Days Reduction$3.1M$4.7M$6.3M$7.5M
Clean Claim Rate$165K$248K$330K$396K
Total$13.6M$20.4M$27.1M$32.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 25 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-16.7%-16.6%-9.3%-4.3%
P23
Net-to-Gross85.1%81.8%84.0%84.9%
P77
Occupancy83.0%69.1%75.2%79.5%
P84
Rev/Bed$1.3M$1.3M$1.5M$1.6M
P18
Exp/Bed$1.5M$1.3M$1.5M$1.8M
P44

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML