Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MERITUS MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 08:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MERITUS MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 210001 | MD | 265 beds | Current EBITDA $6.1M → Pro Forma $27.0M (+$20.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$396.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$20.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$27.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$15.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$20.8M
Modeled Uplift
$14.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.3M (vs $20.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$254K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$20.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.9M$7.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.6M$218K$7.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.6M$4.8M$15.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$254K$254K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT85.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.0M$4.0M$5.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.0M$3.9M$5.9M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$127K$254K$254K$254K$254K$254K$254K
Cumulative$0$5.7M$11.4M$16.9M$20.8M$20.8M$20.8M$20.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $20.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x98% / 30.1x102% / 33.8x106% / 37.5x108% / 39.3x110% / 41.2x
9.0x92% / 26.4x97% / 29.7x101% / 33.0x103% / 34.6x105% / 36.2x
10.0x88% / 23.4x92% / 26.4x97% / 29.3x98% / 30.8x100% / 32.3x
11.0x84% / 21.0x88% / 23.7x92% / 26.4x94% / 27.7x96% / 29.1x
12.0x80% / 19.0x85% / 21.4x89% / 23.9x91% / 25.1x92% / 26.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.6x
Headroom (turns)
70%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 70% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.9x, adding 6.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.1M$6.1M1.5%
Year 1$6.3M+$13.9M$20.2M5.1%
Year 2$6.5M+$20.8M$27.4M6.9%
Year 3$6.7M+$20.8M$27.5M7.0%
Year 4$6.9M+$20.8M$27.8M7.0%
Year 5$7.1M+$20.8M$28.0M7.1%
$61.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$307.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$246.2M
Value Created
$28.0M
Exit EBITDA
$9.8M
Organic Growth
$208.4M
RCM Value Creation
$28.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.0M$5.9M$7.9M$9.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.9M$5.9M$7.8M$9.4M
A/R Days Reduction$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$5.8M
Clean Claim Rate$127K$190K$254K$304K
Total$10.4M$15.6M$20.8M$25.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 33 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.5%-14.2%-8.7%-3.6%
P94
Net-to-Gross81.3%81.6%83.9%85.0%
P19
Occupancy69.1%69.1%75.1%78.3%
P24
Rev/Bed$1.5M$1.3M$1.5M$1.7M
P42
Exp/Bed$1.5M$1.4M$1.6M$2.0M
P33

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML