Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — STEPHENS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL - CAH 2026-04-26 06:17 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — STEPHENS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL - CAH
CCN 201315 | ME | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $4.3M → Pro Forma $9.5M (+$5.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$100.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$5.3M
Modeled Uplift
$4.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.0M (vs $5.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$64K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.0M$2.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.9M$55K$2.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$308K$914K$1.2M$3.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$64K$64K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT57.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$502K$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$497K$994K$1.5M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$407K$815K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$32K$64K$64K$64K$64K$64K$64K
Cumulative$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x70% / 14.3x75% / 16.2x79% / 18.2x81% / 19.2x82% / 20.1x
9.0x65% / 12.3x70% / 14.1x74% / 15.8x76% / 16.7x77% / 17.6x
10.0x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.3x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.7x73% / 15.5x
11.0x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.9x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.8x
12.0x53% / 8.4x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.7x65% / 12.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.7x
Headroom (turns)
42%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 42% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.8x, adding 4.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.3M$4.3M4.2%
Year 1$4.4M+$3.5M$7.9M7.9%
Year 2$4.5M+$5.3M$9.8M9.8%
Year 3$4.7M+$5.3M$9.9M9.9%
Year 4$4.8M+$5.3M$10.1M10.0%
Year 5$4.9M+$5.3M$10.2M10.2%
$42.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$112.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$69.9M
Value Created
$10.2M
Exit EBITDA
$6.8M
Organic Growth
$52.8M
RCM Value Creation
$10.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$994K$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M
A/R Days Reduction$611K$917K$1.2M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$32K$48K$64K$77K
Total$2.6M$4.0M$5.3M$6.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 22 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.2%-10.6%-6.0%0.6%
P77
Net-to-Gross55.5%45.2%54.9%57.1%
P59
Occupancy71.0%44.2%52.3%62.7%
P82
Rev/Bed$4.0M$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M
P82
Exp/Bed$3.8M$1.7M$2.2M$3.1M
P77

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML