Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MAYO REGIONAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:16 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MAYO REGIONAL HOSPITAL
CCN 201309 | ME | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $712K → Pro Forma $3.9M (+$3.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$60.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$712K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$3.2M
Modeled Uplift
$2.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.2M (vs $3.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$739K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$39K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.2M$33K$1.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$186K$553K$739K$2.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$39K$39K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT57.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$304K$607K$911K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$301K$601K$902K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$246K$493K$739K$739K$739K$739K$739K
Clean Claim Rate$0$19K$39K$39K$39K$39K$39K$39K
Cumulative$0$870K$1.7M$2.6M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x107% / 38.0x112% / 42.6x116% / 47.2x118% / 49.5x120% / 51.8x
9.0x102% / 33.4x106% / 37.5x111% / 41.6x113% / 43.6x115% / 45.7x
10.0x97% / 29.8x102% / 33.4x106% / 37.1x108% / 38.9x110% / 40.8x
11.0x93% / 26.8x98% / 30.1x102% / 33.4x104% / 35.1x106% / 36.8x
12.0x89% / 24.3x94% / 27.3x98% / 30.4x100% / 31.9x102% / 33.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.0x
Headroom (turns)
76%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 76% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.5x, adding 6.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$712K$712K1.2%
Year 1$734K+$2.1M$2.9M4.7%
Year 2$756K+$3.2M$4.0M6.5%
Year 3$779K+$3.2M$4.0M6.5%
Year 4$802K+$3.2M$4.0M6.6%
Year 5$826K+$3.2M$4.0M6.6%
$7.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$44.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$37.1M
Value Created
$4.0M
Exit EBITDA
$1.1M
Organic Growth
$31.9M
RCM Value Creation
$4.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$607K$911K$1.2M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$601K$902K$1.2M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$369K$554K$739K$887K
Clean Claim Rate$19K$29K$39K$47K
Total$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 22 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.2%-10.6%-6.0%0.6%
P73
Net-to-Gross56.0%45.2%54.9%57.1%
P68
Occupancy44.2%44.2%52.3%62.7%
P23
Rev/Bed$2.4M$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M
P68
Exp/Bed$2.4M$1.7M$2.2M$3.1M
P59

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML