Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BLUE HILL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BLUE HILL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 201300 | ME | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $3.3M → Pro Forma $5.5M (+$2.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$43.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$2.3M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$825K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $2.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$859K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$851K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$523K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$27K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$859K$859K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$827K$24K$851K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$132K$391K$523K$1.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$27K$27K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT57.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$215K$430K$644K$859K$859K$859K$859K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$213K$425K$638K$851K$851K$851K$851K
A/R Days Reduction$0$174K$349K$523K$523K$523K$523K$523K
Clean Claim Rate$0$14K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K
Cumulative$0$615K$1.2M$1.8M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.3x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.3x70% / 14.0x71% / 14.8x
9.0x54% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.8x
10.0x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.8x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
11.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x
12.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.5x
Headroom (turns)
23%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 23% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.0x, adding 3.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.3M$3.3M7.6%
Year 1$3.4M+$1.5M$4.9M11.4%
Year 2$3.5M+$2.3M$5.7M13.4%
Year 3$3.6M+$2.3M$5.8M13.6%
Year 4$3.7M+$2.3M$6.0M13.9%
Year 5$3.8M+$2.3M$6.1M14.1%
$32.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$66.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$33.9M
Value Created
$6.1M
Exit EBITDA
$5.2M
Organic Growth
$22.6M
RCM Value Creation
$6.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$430K$644K$859K$1.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$425K$638K$851K$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$261K$392K$523K$627K
Clean Claim Rate$14K$21K$27K$33K
Total$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 22 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.6%-10.6%-6.0%0.6%
P86
Net-to-Gross62.5%45.2%54.9%57.1%
P86
Occupancy31.1%44.2%52.3%62.7%
P14
Rev/Bed$1.7M$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M
P27
Exp/Bed$1.6M$1.7M$2.2M$3.1M
P23

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML