Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LAKE PINES HOSPITAL LLC 2026-04-26 09:28 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LAKE PINES HOSPITAL LLC
CCN 194113 | LA | 36 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.7M → Pro Forma $-1.3M (+$388K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$7.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$388K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+539bps
Margin Improvement
$276K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$388K
Modeled Uplift
$281K
Risk-Adjusted
-$107K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$147K
+204bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$144K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$88K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+13bp
Total EBITDA Impact$388K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$139K$8K$147K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$144K$144K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$22K$66K$88K$276K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT55.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$37K$73K$110K$147K$147K$147K$147K
Cost to Collect$0$36K$72K$108K$144K$144K$144K$144K
A/R Days Reduction$0$29K$58K$88K$88K$88K$88K$88K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$107K$213K$315K$388K$388K$388K$388K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $388K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.7M$-1.7M-22.9%
Year 1$-1.7M+$259K$-1.4M-20.0%
Year 2$-1.8M+$388K$-1.4M-18.9%
Year 3$-1.8M+$388K$-1.4M-19.7%
Year 4$-1.9M+$388K$-1.5M-20.4%
Year 5$-1.9M+$388K$-1.5M-21.2%
$-16.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-16.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$-275K
Value Created
$-1.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-2.6M
Organic Growth
$3.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-1.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$73K$110K$147K$176K
Cost to Collect$72K$108K$144K$173K
A/R Days Reduction$44K$66K$88K$105K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$194K$291K$388K$466K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 132 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-22.9%-20.9%-3.5%4.9%
P21
Net-to-Gross35.5%31.6%43.2%55.8%
P33
Occupancy82.0%21.7%47.9%69.0%
P91
Rev/Bed$200K$278K$452K$807K
P8
Exp/Bed$246K$265K$445K$963K
P21

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML