Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — COMPASS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER OF 2026-04-26 15:51 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — COMPASS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER OF
CCN 194109 | LA | 20 beds | Current EBITDA $-129K → Pro Forma $78K (+$207K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$3.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-129K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$207K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$78K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+563bps
Margin Improvement
$141K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$207K
Modeled Uplift
$137K
Risk-Adjusted
-$69K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.1M (vs $0.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$79K
+215bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$73K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$45K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+26bp
Total EBITDA Impact$207K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$71K$8K$79K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$73K$73K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$11K$33K$45K$141K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT59.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$20K$39K$59K$79K$79K$79K$79K
Cost to Collect$0$18K$37K$55K$73K$73K$73K$73K
A/R Days Reduction$0$15K$30K$45K$45K$45K$45K$45K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$58K$116K$169K$207K$207K$207K$207K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $207K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-14.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
20.5x
Headroom (turns)
315%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 315% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -14.0x, adding 113.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-129K$-129K-3.5%
Year 1$-133K+$138K$5K0.1%
Year 2$-137K+$207K$70K1.9%
Year 3$-141K+$207K$66K1.8%
Year 4$-145K+$207K$62K1.7%
Year 5$-149K+$207K$57K1.6%
$-1.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$632K
Exit EV (11x)
$1.9M
Value Created
$57K
Exit EBITDA
$-205K
Organic Growth
$2.1M
RCM Value Creation
$57K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$39K$59K$79K$95K
Cost to Collect$37K$55K$73K$88K
A/R Days Reduction$22K$34K$45K$54K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$103K$155K$207K$248K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 127 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.5%-15.4%-2.3%7.2%
P48
Net-to-Gross70.9%32.3%45.9%59.6%
P88
Occupancy50.7%20.5%46.1%69.5%
P55
Rev/Bed$184K$290K$537K$964K
P3
Exp/Bed$190K$277K$514K$985K
P6

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML