Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OCEANS BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL OF OPELOU 2026-04-26 19:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OCEANS BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL OF OPELOU
CCN 194095 | LA | 20 beds | Current EBITDA $776K → Pro Forma $1.1M (+$357K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$6.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$776K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$357K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+541bps
Margin Improvement
$253K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$357K
Modeled Uplift
$263K
Risk-Adjusted
-$94K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$135K
+205bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$132K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$80K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+15bp
Total EBITDA Impact$357K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$127K$8K$135K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$132K$132K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$20K$60K$80K$253K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT59.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$34K$68K$101K$135K$135K$135K$135K
Cost to Collect$0$33K$66K$99K$132K$132K$132K$132K
A/R Days Reduction$0$27K$54K$80K$80K$80K$80K$80K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$98K$197K$290K$357K$357K$357K$357K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $357K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x
9.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
10.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.9x56% / 9.4x
11.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x52% / 8.2x
12.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.7x
Headroom (turns)
11%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 11% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.8x, adding 2.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$776K$776K11.8%
Year 1$799K+$238K$1.0M15.7%
Year 2$823K+$357K$1.2M17.9%
Year 3$848K+$357K$1.2M18.3%
Year 4$873K+$357K$1.2M18.6%
Year 5$899K+$357K$1.3M19.0%
$7.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$13.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$6.1M
Value Created
$1.3M
Exit EBITDA
$1.2M
Organic Growth
$3.6M
RCM Value Creation
$1.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$68K$101K$135K$162K
Cost to Collect$66K$99K$132K$158K
A/R Days Reduction$40K$60K$80K$96K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$179K$268K$357K$429K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 127 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.8%-15.4%-2.3%7.2%
P81
Net-to-Gross44.2%32.3%45.9%59.6%
P48
Occupancy86.6%20.5%46.1%69.5%
P96
Rev/Bed$330K$290K$537K$964K
P31
Exp/Bed$291K$277K$514K$985K
P28

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML