Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OCEANS BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL OF HAMMON 2026-04-26 05:25 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OCEANS BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL OF HAMMON
CCN 194091 | LA | 52 beds | Current EBITDA $3.9M → Pro Forma $4.7M (+$768K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$14.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$768K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$560K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$768K
Modeled Uplift
$561K
Risk-Adjusted
-$208K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$292K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$289K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$178K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$768K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$292K$292K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$281K$8K$289K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$45K$133K$178K$560K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$73K$146K$219K$292K$292K$292K$292K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$72K$145K$217K$289K$289K$289K$289K
A/R Days Reduction$0$59K$118K$178K$178K$178K$178K$178K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$209K$419K$623K$768K$768K$768K$768K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $768K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x
9.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x
10.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x
12.0x27% / 3.4x33% / 4.1x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.6x
Headroom (turns)
-9%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -9% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.1x, adding 1.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.9M$3.9M26.8%
Year 1$4.0M+$512K$4.5M31.1%
Year 2$4.1M+$768K$4.9M33.6%
Year 3$4.3M+$768K$5.0M34.5%
Year 4$4.4M+$768K$5.2M35.4%
Year 5$4.5M+$768K$5.3M36.3%
$39.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$58.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$19.2M
Value Created
$5.3M
Exit EBITDA
$6.2M
Organic Growth
$7.7M
RCM Value Creation
$5.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$146K$219K$292K$350K
Denial Rate Reductio$145K$217K$289K$347K
A/R Days Reduction$89K$133K$178K$213K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$384K$576K$768K$922K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 87 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin26.8%-22.7%-3.1%4.8%
P95
Net-to-Gross46.2%26.8%35.8%46.0%
P75
Occupancy86.7%27.4%54.8%69.8%
P99
Rev/Bed$281K$252K$394K$708K
P31
Exp/Bed$206K$230K$422K$873K
P18

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML