Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OCEANS BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL OF LAKE C 2026-04-26 08:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OCEANS BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL OF LAKE C
CCN 194090 | LA | 20 beds | Current EBITDA $89K → Pro Forma $410K (+$321K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$5.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$89K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$321K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$410K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+544bps
Margin Improvement
$226K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$321K
Modeled Uplift
$235K
Risk-Adjusted
-$86K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$122K
+207bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$118K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$72K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+16bp
Total EBITDA Impact$321K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$113K$8K$122K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$118K$118K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$18K$54K$72K$226K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT59.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$30K$61K$91K$122K$122K$122K$122K
Cost to Collect$0$29K$59K$88K$118K$118K$118K$118K
A/R Days Reduction$0$24K$48K$72K$72K$72K$72K$72K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$89K$177K$261K$321K$321K$321K$321K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $321K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x99% / 31.6x104% / 35.5x108% / 39.3x110% / 41.3x112% / 43.2x
9.0x94% / 27.7x99% / 31.2x103% / 34.6x105% / 36.3x107% / 38.0x
10.0x90% / 24.6x94% / 27.7x98% / 30.8x100% / 32.4x102% / 33.9x
11.0x86% / 22.1x90% / 24.9x94% / 27.7x96% / 29.1x98% / 30.5x
12.0x82% / 20.0x86% / 22.6x91% / 25.1x92% / 26.4x94% / 27.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.7x
Headroom (turns)
72%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 72% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.8x, adding 6.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$89K$89K1.5%
Year 1$92K+$214K$306K5.2%
Year 2$94K+$321K$415K7.0%
Year 3$97K+$321K$418K7.1%
Year 4$100K+$321K$421K7.1%
Year 5$103K+$321K$424K7.2%
$890K
Entry EV (10x)
$4.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$3.8M
Value Created
$424K
Exit EBITDA
$142K
Organic Growth
$3.2M
RCM Value Creation
$424K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$61K$91K$122K$146K
Cost to Collect$59K$88K$118K$141K
A/R Days Reduction$36K$54K$72K$86K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$160K$241K$321K$385K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 127 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.5%-15.4%-2.3%7.2%
P56
Net-to-Gross47.5%32.3%45.9%59.6%
P54
Occupancy87.3%20.5%46.1%69.5%
P98
Rev/Bed$295K$290K$537K$964K
P26
Exp/Bed$290K$277K$514K$985K
P28

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML