Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FREEDOM BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL OF MONRO 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FREEDOM BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL OF MONRO
CCN 194087 | LA | 24 beds | Current EBITDA $-431K → Pro Forma $-145K (+$286K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$5.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-431K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$286K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-145K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+548bps
Margin Improvement
$200K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$286K
Modeled Uplift
$206K
Risk-Adjusted
-$80K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$109K
+208bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$104K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$64K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+18bp
Total EBITDA Impact$286K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$101K$8K$109K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$104K$104K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$16K$48K$64K$200K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT59.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$27K$54K$82K$109K$109K$109K$109K
Cost to Collect$0$26K$52K$78K$104K$104K$104K$104K
A/R Days Reduction$0$21K$42K$64K$64K$64K$64K$64K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$79K$159K$233K$286K$286K$286K$286K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $286K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-431K$-431K-8.3%
Year 1$-444K+$191K$-253K-4.8%
Year 2$-457K+$286K$-171K-3.3%
Year 3$-471K+$286K$-185K-3.5%
Year 4$-485K+$286K$-199K-3.8%
Year 5$-500K+$286K$-213K-4.1%
$-4.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-2.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$2.0M
Value Created
$-213K
Exit EBITDA
$-686K
Organic Growth
$2.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-213K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$54K$82K$109K$131K
Cost to Collect$52K$78K$104K$125K
A/R Days Reduction$32K$48K$64K$76K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$143K$215K$286K$344K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 130 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-8.3%-14.8%-2.1%6.3%
P35
Net-to-Gross42.9%33.1%46.2%59.8%
P45
Occupancy75.5%20.5%46.4%69.8%
P83
Rev/Bed$218K$288K$460K$881K
P11
Exp/Bed$236K$276K$445K$961K
P15

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML