Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — COMPASS BEHAVIORAL CENTER LLC 2026-04-26 17:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — COMPASS BEHAVIORAL CENTER LLC
CCN 194085 | LA | 24 beds | Current EBITDA $-158K → Pro Forma $206K (+$364K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$6.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-158K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$364K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$206K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+541bps
Margin Improvement
$258K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$364K
Modeled Uplift
$245K
Risk-Adjusted
-$119K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$138K
+205bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$135K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$82K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+14bp
Total EBITDA Impact$364K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$130K$8K$138K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$135K$135K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$21K$61K$82K$258K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT59.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$34K$69K$103K$138K$138K$138K$138K
Cost to Collect$0$34K$67K$101K$135K$135K$135K$135K
A/R Days Reduction$0$27K$55K$82K$82K$82K$82K$82K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$100K$200K$296K$364K$364K$364K$364K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $364K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-6.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
13.0x
Headroom (turns)
200%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 200% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -6.5x, adding 105.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-158K$-158K-2.3%
Year 1$-163K+$243K$80K1.2%
Year 2$-167K+$364K$197K2.9%
Year 3$-172K+$364K$192K2.8%
Year 4$-178K+$364K$186K2.8%
Year 5$-183K+$364K$181K2.7%
$-1.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$2.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$3.6M
Value Created
$181K
Exit EBITDA
$-251K
Organic Growth
$3.6M
RCM Value Creation
$181K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$69K$103K$138K$165K
Cost to Collect$67K$101K$135K$162K
A/R Days Reduction$41K$61K$82K$98K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$182K$273K$364K$437K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 130 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-2.3%-14.8%-2.1%6.3%
P49
Net-to-Gross64.9%33.1%46.2%59.8%
P80
Occupancy52.1%20.5%46.4%69.8%
P54
Rev/Bed$281K$288K$460K$881K
P23
Exp/Bed$287K$276K$445K$961K
P28

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML