Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OCEANS BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL OF DERIDD 2026-04-26 15:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OCEANS BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL OF DERIDD
CCN 194081 | LA | 20 beds | Current EBITDA $1.2M → Pro Forma $1.5M (+$305K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$5.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$305K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+546bps
Margin Improvement
$214K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$305K
Modeled Uplift
$222K
Risk-Adjusted
-$82K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$116K
+207bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$112K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$68K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+17bp
Total EBITDA Impact$305K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$107K$8K$116K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$112K$112K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$17K$51K$68K$214K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT59.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$29K$58K$87K$116K$116K$116K$116K
Cost to Collect$0$28K$56K$84K$112K$112K$112K$112K
A/R Days Reduction$0$23K$45K$68K$68K$68K$68K$68K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$84K$169K$248K$305K$305K$305K$305K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $305K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x60% / 10.6x
9.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x55% / 9.1x
10.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x
11.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
12.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.2x
Headroom (turns)
-3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.7x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.2M$1.2M20.7%
Year 1$1.2M+$203K$1.4M25.0%
Year 2$1.2M+$305K$1.5M27.4%
Year 3$1.3M+$305K$1.6M28.1%
Year 4$1.3M+$305K$1.6M28.8%
Year 5$1.3M+$305K$1.6M29.5%
$11.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$18.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$6.5M
Value Created
$1.6M
Exit EBITDA
$1.8M
Organic Growth
$3.0M
RCM Value Creation
$1.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$58K$87K$116K$139K
Cost to Collect$56K$84K$112K$134K
A/R Days Reduction$34K$51K$68K$82K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$152K$229K$305K$366K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 127 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin20.7%-15.4%-2.3%7.2%
P90
Net-to-Gross47.9%32.3%45.9%59.6%
P54
Occupancy82.6%20.5%46.1%69.5%
P91
Rev/Bed$279K$290K$537K$964K
P21
Exp/Bed$221K$277K$514K$985K
P11

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML