Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BEACON BEH HOSP NORTHSHORE 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BEACON BEH HOSP NORTHSHORE
CCN 194080 | LA | 22 beds | Current EBITDA $-384K → Pro Forma $-140K (+$245K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$4.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-384K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$245K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-140K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+555bps
Margin Improvement
$169K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$245K
Modeled Uplift
$167K
Risk-Adjusted
-$78K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$93K
+211bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$88K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$54K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+22bp
Total EBITDA Impact$245K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$85K$8K$93K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$88K$88K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$14K$40K$54K$169K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$23K$47K$70K$93K$93K$93K$93K
Cost to Collect$0$22K$44K$66K$88K$88K$88K$88K
A/R Days Reduction$0$18K$36K$54K$54K$54K$54K$54K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$68K$136K$199K$245K$245K$245K$245K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $245K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-384K$-384K-8.7%
Year 1$-396K+$163K$-233K-5.3%
Year 2$-408K+$245K$-163K-3.7%
Year 3$-420K+$245K$-175K-4.0%
Year 4$-433K+$245K$-188K-4.3%
Year 5$-446K+$245K$-201K-4.5%
$-3.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-2.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$1.6M
Value Created
$-201K
Exit EBITDA
$-612K
Organic Growth
$2.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-201K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$47K$70K$93K$112K
Cost to Collect$44K$66K$88K$106K
A/R Days Reduction$27K$40K$54K$64K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$122K$184K$245K$294K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 124 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-8.7%-14.5%-2.1%6.3%
P34
Net-to-Gross50.7%33.4%45.1%60.1%
P61
Occupancy64.3%21.1%46.4%69.8%
P68
Rev/Bed$201K$288K$466K$891K
P8
Exp/Bed$218K$274K$468K$964K
P11

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML