Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ACADIA VERMILION HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ACADIA VERMILION HOSPITAL
CCN 194044 | LA | 78 beds | Current EBITDA $1.3M → Pro Forma $2.2M (+$927K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$17.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$927K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$676K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$927K
Modeled Uplift
$659K
Risk-Adjusted
-$267K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$352K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$349K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$214K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$927K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$352K$352K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$339K$10K$349K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$54K$160K$214K$676K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$88K$176K$264K$352K$352K$352K$352K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$87K$174K$262K$349K$349K$349K$349K
A/R Days Reduction$0$71K$143K$214K$214K$214K$214K$214K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$252K$505K$751K$927K$927K$927K$927K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $927K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x60% / 10.5x64% / 12.0x68% / 13.5x70% / 14.3x72% / 15.1x
9.0x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.3x63% / 11.7x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x
10.0x51% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x
11.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x
12.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.6x
Headroom (turns)
24%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 24% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.9x, adding 3.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.3M$1.3M7.3%
Year 1$1.3M+$618K$1.9M11.1%
Year 2$1.4M+$927K$2.3M13.0%
Year 3$1.4M+$927K$2.3M13.3%
Year 4$1.5M+$927K$2.4M13.5%
Year 5$1.5M+$927K$2.4M13.8%
$12.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$26.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$13.8M
Value Created
$2.4M
Exit EBITDA
$2.1M
Organic Growth
$9.3M
RCM Value Creation
$2.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$176K$264K$352K$423K
Denial Rate Reductio$174K$262K$349K$419K
A/R Days Reduction$107K$161K$214K$257K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$8K$11K$14K
Total$463K$695K$927K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 64 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.3%-27.4%-3.4%3.2%
P86
Net-to-Gross35.6%22.7%32.4%42.4%
P59
Occupancy77.7%28.6%48.4%65.1%
P91
Rev/Bed$226K$260K$416K$774K
P21
Exp/Bed$209K$224K$421K$939K
P22

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML