Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LONGLEAF HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:09 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LONGLEAF HOSPITAL
CCN 194022 | LA | 139 beds | Current EBITDA $12.1M → Pro Forma $14.0M (+$1.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$36.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$12.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$14.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$1.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$532K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $1.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$732K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$725K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$445K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$23K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$732K$732K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$705K$20K$725K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$112K$333K$445K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$23K$23K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$183K$366K$549K$732K$732K$732K$732K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$181K$362K$544K$725K$725K$725K$725K
A/R Days Reduction$0$148K$297K$445K$445K$445K$445K$445K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K
Cumulative$0$524K$1.0M$1.6M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.5x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
9.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
10.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x
11.0x30% / 3.8x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x
12.0x26% / 3.2x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.6x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.8x
Headroom (turns)
-12%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -12% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.3x, adding 1.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$12.1M$12.1M33.0%
Year 1$12.4M+$1.3M$13.7M37.5%
Year 2$12.8M+$1.9M$14.7M40.3%
Year 3$13.2M+$1.9M$15.1M41.3%
Year 4$13.6M+$1.9M$15.5M42.4%
Year 5$14.0M+$1.9M$15.9M43.5%
$120.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$175.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$54.4M
Value Created
$15.9M
Exit EBITDA
$19.2M
Organic Growth
$19.3M
RCM Value Creation
$15.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$366K$549K$732K$878K
Denial Rate Reductio$362K$544K$725K$870K
A/R Days Reduction$223K$334K$445K$534K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$18K$23K$28K
Total$963K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 44 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin33.0%-12.3%-4.1%3.2%
P98
Net-to-Gross35.6%18.9%25.8%34.7%
P79
Occupancy85.9%37.6%55.9%69.1%
P98
Rev/Bed$263K$271K$927K$1.4M
P23
Exp/Bed$176K$303K$1.0M$1.6M
P7

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML